Amiga Plus 1995 #5 & #6/Amiga Plus CD - 1995 - No. 5 and 6.iso/pd/grafik/lightwave/lightwave-june95/[e-mail]_Thu Jun 15 19:19:28 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-07-04 | 2KB

Received: by webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA191419168; Thu, 15 Jun 1995 19:19:28 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from netcom22.netcom.com by webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA191159155; Thu, 15 Jun 1995 19:19:15 -0700
Received: by netcom22.netcom.com (8.6.12/Netcom)
    id TAA15917; Thu, 15 Jun 1995 19:22:22 -0700
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 1995 19:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kim Thomas <[e-mail]>
Subject: PC/Amiga Rendering
To: LW Mailing List <[e-mail]>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.9506151946.A14817-0100000@netcom22>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

Here's the plan: I have a 1050 frame animation that I've set up on my
Amiga LW. I'm going to start rendering forward on the Amiga (writing the
frames to the PAR), and backwards on the PC, stopping when they catch up
to one another. There will be no noticable differences in the frames,
right? Has anyone else done this? I'm assuming it will work, but if it
doesn't, someone let me know now before I render all these frames.

Dave Thomas
Moving Pixels
"I haven't actually read your script, but I have
some questions about it" - Actual client quote
[e-mail]

--
Kim Thomas <[e-mail]> sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]